Cases 141 - 150 of 50,300
ALI-YUZON GAUS v. MCGEE, et. al
as 2:2024cv01271
Petitioner:
ISA ALI-YUZON GAUS
Respondent:
SEAN P. MCGEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GINDRAW v. SANFORD et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
TAHMIR GINDRAW
Defendant:
LT. SANFORD and LT. HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. EPFURSICH
as 5:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
JACQULYN EPFURSICH and JACQULYN E. PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demuro-Correll v. Haidle et al
as 3:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael Demuro-Correll
Defendant:
Warden Haidle and Correctional Officer Kubic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Little et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
George Little, John Wetzel, Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE OF SCI HOUTZDALE
as 2:2024cv02018
Petitioner:
LEROY WILSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE OF SCI HOUTZDALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cicchiello v. Warden Briggs et al
as 3:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
Joan Cicchiello
Respondent:
Warden Briggs and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cooper v. Prince et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bruce X. Cooper
Defendant:
Scott Prince and Mark Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
IN RE: TUNSIL
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
