Cases 141 - 150 of 12,488
Brown v. Warner
as 2:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Diondrae Brown
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collier v. Haynes
as 2:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Aaron Christopher Collier
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sayidin v. Warner
as 2:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Mahamad Hussein Sayidin
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petersen v. Flood
as 2:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Petersen
Respondent:
John Flood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Braa v. Perkins
as 2:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Kevin Jory Braa
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski and Jefferey Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouse v. Hansen et al
as 3:2024cv05068
Plaintiff:
Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Kevin Hansen, David Guidrey, Randy Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bones et al v H.I.G. Capital LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bones, T. G. and C. G.
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital, LLC., Wellpath, County of Clallam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
Howard Bennett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Knoeb v. Yakima Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Roy Castillo Knoeb, III
Defendant:
Yakima Department of Corrections and Washington Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
