Cases 151 - 160 of 259
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2015cv01951
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Joe Riley, Keith Sumney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 6:2015cv01896
Plaintiff:
Nathan Warren Albert
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Alan Wilson and Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julian Rochester v. William Nettles, et al
as 15-5474
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM N. NETTLES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ALAN WILSON and others
Robert Lee Foster v. Cecilia Reynold
as 15-6629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden, BRYANT STIRLING, Director of SCDC, ALAN WILSON, Attorney General Off and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
James v. Wilson et al
as 1:2015cv01716
Plaintiff:
Anthony James
Defendant:
Scarlett Wilson and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolin v. Stirling et al
as 4:2015cv01523
Petitioner:
Berry Scott Bolin
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rochester v. Federal Prison Director et al
as 3:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
Federal Prison Director, U. S. Atty. Gen., W. N. Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Robinson County Police Dept et al
as 2:2015cv01359
Plaintiff:
Mario Brown
Defendant:
Robinson County Police Dept, LeFon Legette, Kinard Redmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
