Cases 151 - 160 of 171
Ubaldini v. Prime Care Medical, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01664
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Ubaldini
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gravely v. Desoto et al
as 1:2011cv01163
Plaintiff:
Fredderick Gravely
Defendant:
Edward P Desoto, Mirirosa Lamas, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roddy v. Seifert et al
as 1:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bobby Eugene Roddy
Defendant:
Evelyn Seifert, Karen Pszczolkowski, Gregory L. Yahnke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Reitz et al
as 1:2010cv02670
Plaintiff:
Zack Brown
Defendant:
Warden Earl Reitz, Cumberland County Prison, Health Services Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOYTE v. YORK COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2010cv05969
Plaintiff:
MARVIN HOYTE
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY PRISON and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2010cv01989
Plaintiff:
Bogart Justin Williams
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mueller v. Centre County Correctional facility et al
as 3:2010cv00708
Plaintiff:
Robert N. Mueller, Jr.
Defendant:
Centre County Correctional facility, Edward P DeSabato, Hite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARFIELD v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 4:2009cv01909
Plaintiff:
Darryl Barfield
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc., William Young, Brian Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOYE v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 5:2009cv02933
Plaintiff:
INELL M. FOYE
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., JOSIE BAHNICK, ERIK VONKEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIGUEL v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2009cv00949
Plaintiff:
RAMON SAN MIGUEL
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
