Cases 161 - 170 of 172
Baker v. Sinclair
as 3:2009cv05505
Petitioner:
James Eugene Baker
Respondent:
Stephen Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Washington State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2009cv05065
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Washington State Penitentiary and Stephen Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stith v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv05060
Plaintiff:
Robert K Stith
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Elden Vale, Stephen Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Dept of Corrections State of Washington et al
as 2:2009cv05047
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections State of Washington, Eldon Vail, Jeff Uttecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tonelli v. Doe et al
as 2:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Luciano Tonelli
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe, Terry Woodland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Greene v. Stephen Sinclair
as 09-35485
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM B. GREENE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN SINCLAIR
Sarah Babcock v. Harold Clarke, et al
as 09-35445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAH BABCOCK, AKA John Babcock
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, RUBEN CEDENO, JEFFREY A. UTTECHT and others
Dwayne Woods v. Stephen Sinclair
as 09-99003
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWAYNE ANTHONY WOODS
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN SINCLAIR
Brown et al v. Vail et al
as 3:2009cv05101
Plaintiff:
Cal Coburn Brown and Jonathan Gentry
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Eldon Vail, Stephen Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Agee v. Sundberg et al
as 2:2008cv01718
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Agee
Defendant:
Steve Sundberg, Rick Moss, John Avery and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
