Cases 171 - 180 of 950
Jones v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
Chasity Jones, Anderson Pointe, Tracy Lounsbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Henry et al
as 4:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Byron Wallace
Defendant:
Guy Henry, Monga, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Henry et al
as 6:2022cv06043
Plaintiff:
Byron Wallace
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry, Monga, Sgt. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Does
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Does Law Clerk to Judge Billy Roy Wilson, Law Clerk to Judge James Moody and Magistrate Judge Joe Volpe, and EDAR Filing Clerks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Jane or John Doe #1 et al
as 5:2022cv05056
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe #1, Jane or John Doe #2 and Jane and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Terry L McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Stanley James, Gary McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. Smit et al
as 4:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Christopher Everett
Defendant:
Smit, Jones and Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. Creach et al
as 4:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Christopher Everett
Defendant:
Creach, Jones, Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Rhodes et al
as 4:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Richard Rhodes, Terry Jones and Scott Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Dustin M Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
