Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Cender v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00667
Defendant:
Amy Jones, Linda Benson, Dennis Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Cender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Wright et al
as 5:2018cv00971
Petitioner:
Amy Bishop Anderson
Respondent:
Wright and Attorney General of the State of ALabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collis-Bey v. Covington County, Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Aphrey B. Collis-Bey
Defendant:
Covington County, Alabama, Amy Jones and Nathan Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Skoog et al
as 5:2014cv01217
Plaintiff:
James D Johnson
Defendant:
Skoog, Shirley, Linda and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Still v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00675
Plaintiff:
Keith C. Still
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Corizon Medical Services, Inc., Amy Mashburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
Amy Ann Pitts
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bass v. Butler et al
as 2:2010cv02445
Plaintiff:
Tommy Bass
Defendant:
Freddie Butler, Chris Markham, Amy Williford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest v. Watkins et al
as 2:2010cv02239
Plaintiff:
Willie Herman Forrest
Defendant:
Sheldon Watkins, Melissa Reynolds, Shelia Ann Weil and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
