Cases 11 - 20 of 93
JOHNSON v. DOE #1 et al
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. BRIDGEWATER et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER, PEREZ, DUPREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCKLEY v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
PATRICK WAYNE BUCKLEY
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, PABLO PEREZ, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION SERVICES, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00183
Petitioner:
OSCAR PEREZ
Respondent:
REBECCA HOLWARDA and CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEREZ v. LIGGINS et al
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
ERIC PEREZ
Defendant:
LONNIE LIGGINS, DERRIK MALONE and ANTONIO KIMBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROUZIER v. JAFFE et al
as 1:2022cv02302
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Defendant:
B. JAFFE, CORIZON, ALFA FINOTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAPETANIOS v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
DONALD KAPETANIOS
Defendant:
CENTURION, PEREZ and ERIN SPRINKLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUGH v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. BAUGH
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, BRIDGE WATERS, P. PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
