Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Balcar et al v. Kentucky State Reformatory et al
as 3:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Yale L. Balcar and Clarence Russell
Defendant:
Kentucky State Reformatory, Aaron Smith and Casey Dowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Tarter v. Kentucky State Reformatory, et al
as 17-5550
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY TARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE REFORMATORY, AARON SMITH, CASEY DOWDEN, Correction Officer and others
Tarter v. Kentucky State Reformatory et al
as 3:2016cv00773
Plaintiff:
Troy Tarter
Defendant:
Kentucky State Reformatory, Aaron Smith, Dowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Dowden v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-41002
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL DOWDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Dowden v. Texas Department of Public Safety
as 2:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Michael Dowden
Defendant:
Texas Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowden v. State Of Texas
as 2:2014cv01100
Petitioner:
Michael Dowden
Respondent:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dowden v. Kelly et al
as 1:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dowden
Defendant:
FNU Kelly, Matt Cotton and Jefferson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Michael Puisis, Michael Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowden v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv01956
Petitioner:
William C. Dowden
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Payne v. Dowden et al
as 1:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
Larry William Payne
Defendant:
Buddy Dowden, Jack Dieken, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
