Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Howard #247075 v. Macauley et al
as 1:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Akmal Howard #247075
Defendant:
Matt Macauley, Unknown Fuller, Unknown Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith #165268 v. Huss et al
as 2:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Erica Huss, Joe Biden, Dana Nessel and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon J. Griffith #165268
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett #200640 v. Macauley et al
as 1:2020cv01116
Defendant:
Matt Macauley, Wendy Lane and D. Bolton
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders #305405 v. Washington et al
as 1:2020cv00871
Defendant:
Unknown Party #2, Unknown Teelander, Unknown Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders #305405
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant #463608 et al v. Horton et al
as 2:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
James Randle #224414, Kevin Weems #156780, Roger Ray #231180 and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Connie Horton and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott #593524 v. Huss et al
as 2:2020cv00044
Plaintiff:
Ventron Lott #593524
Defendant:
Erica Huss, Catherine Lynch, Unknown Meeten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanDiver v. Funches et al
as 3:2018cv12299
Defendant:
Michigan Dept of Corrections, Piper, R. Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry VanDiver
Bolton #572431 v. Palmer
as 1:2017cv00666
Petitioner:
Kenneth Edward Bolton #572431, III
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore #223268 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00615
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore #223268
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Trinity Services Group of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv11957
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Trinity Services Group of Florida and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
