Cases 11 - 20 of 236
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. USA
as 4:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Nigel Clarke
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. Clark et al
as 5:2023hc02181
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Officer Clark and DHO Dexter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estes v. Mayo
as 5:2023ct03221
Plaintiff:
Gloria Hughes Estes
Defendant:
Beverly Clark Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meza-Rodriguez v. Evans et al
as 5:2023ct03240
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Meza-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Charlotte Evans, Nurse Pierre, Mashell Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Letterlough v. Cothron et al
as 5:2023ct03192
Plaintiff:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough and Derrick Letterlough
Defendant:
David E. Cothron, Demetrius A. Clark and Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens, FNU Bevins, FNU Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Cooper et al
as 1:2023cv00093
Defendant:
Ralph Gilbert, III, Douglas Gold, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Nash Correctional Institution
as 5:2023ct03091
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Clark
Defendant:
Nash Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
