Cases 11 - 20 of 2,430
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Clarke
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Clark
as 1:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
James Robert Nelson
Respondent:
Harold Clark and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Michael Sean Taylor
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kevin Macoy, T. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lumpkin v. Clarke of Mental Health at Sussex I State Prison
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Clarke of Mental Health at Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, K. Burcham, CJ MacVean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
