Cases 11 - 20 of 2,276
Stokes v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Ralph Stokes
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uderra v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Jose Uderra
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramm v. USA
as 1:2024cv00589
Petitioner:
Karen E. Ramm
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH
as 2:2024cv01488
Petitioner:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Respondent:
JACQUELYN E. PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERTSON v. EPFURSICH
as 5:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
JACQULYN EPFURSICH and JACQULYN E. PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cave v. Dauphin County Prison
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Cave
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison and Miss Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARITT v. HERNAN et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
GEORGE E. CLARITT
Respondent:
RICHARD HERNAN, JOSH SHAPIRO and MELISSA HAINSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
BRYANT YOUNG
Defendant:
SECRETARY DR. LAUREL HARRY, SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, DEPUTY SECRETARY T. FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. CRISTINI et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
R. CRISTINI, E. HURD, D. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGINNIS v. HILL et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
VERN E. MCGINNIS, JR.
Defendant:
NURSE KAREN HILL, CHCA JANA JORDAN, NURSE KATE HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
