Cases 11 - 20 of 203
John v. USA
as 8:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Emmanuel John
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pieper v. Sabatka-Rine
as 8:2023cv00009
Petitioner:
John Pieper
Respondent:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dalton v. Gable
as 4:2022cv03269
Petitioner:
John W. Dalton, Jr.
Respondent:
Craig Gable
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rimmer v. Dakota County Jail et al
as 8:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Malik Rimmer
Defendant:
Dakota County Jail, Jinnifer, John Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Ricketts, Doug Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Myers et al
as 4:2022cv03138
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Defendant:
Michael Myers and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Frakes et al
as 8:2022cv00254
Defendant:
John J Howard
Respondent:
Scot R. Frakes and Scott R. Frakes
Petitioner:
John Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carroll v. Auman et al
as 8:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Carroll
Defendant:
John Auman, Amy Volbrecht, Tracy Cullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Frakes et al
as 4:2022cv03071
Plaintiff:
Cameron Williams
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Brad Hansen, Captain Unknown Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanes v. Frakes et al
as 8:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Elvis Hanes
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Rosalyn Cotton, Layne Gissler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
