Cases 11 - 20 of 449
PERRY - EL v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN PERRY - EL
Defendant:
BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CAMERAN WITT, KIMBERLY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Merci et al
as 5:2022ct03006
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Ellis
Defendant:
Sergeant Merci, James Honeycutt, Cory Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. TOWN OF SOUTHERN PINES et al
as 1:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
LEE MARVIN HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
THE TOWN OF SOUTHERN PINES, OFFICER JASON PERRY, OFFICER SEAN LOWERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Wake County Courts
as 5:2021ct03352
Plaintiff:
Perry R. Brown, IV and Percy R. Brown, IV
Defendant:
Wake County Courts, District Attorney's Office of NC, Raleigh Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stolz v. Lynch et al
as 5:2021ct03337
Plaintiff:
Sean Stolz
Defendant:
Sgt. Lynch, Sgt. Massenburg, C/O Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEYERS v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MR. JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. S. BRADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Cuitillar et al
as 5:2021ct03307
Plaintiff:
David Dwayne Perry
Defendant:
Dr. MD Cuitillar, Mrs. Wiggins, Dr. Nogo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Davis et al
as 5:2021ct03263
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Franklin Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Davis, Anthony Collins, Pamlico County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Cathey et al
as 3:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Dan Rogers, Jonathan Perry, Eddie Cathey and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Daniel Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
