Cases 11 - 20 of 262
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Jimmy Smith, Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
James Ryan Ross
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Jimmy Smith, Warden Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Putnam et al
as 4:2023cv04026
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kenneth Putnam, Amber Ochoa, Marcus Spivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Cueto
as 5:2023cv01324
Petitioner:
Earnest Lynn Ross
Respondent:
Senior Warden Edmundo R. Cueto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pinson v. Dallas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv01915
Plaintiff:
Tahj Pinson
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail, FNU Goondall, FNU Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. USA
as 4:2023cv00641
Petitioner:
Earnest Lynn Ross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Hendricks v. S.A.P.D. et al
as 5:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Ross Hendricks
Defendant:
S.A.P.D., Bexar County Law Library, Arlene M. Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brantley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brantley v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00097
Petitioner:
Ross Thomas Brantley and Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
