Cases 11 - 20 of 214
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Danville City Jail
as 7:2023cv00654
Petitioner:
Brittany Alexander Smith
Respondent:
Danville City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Danville City Jail
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Brittnany Alexander Smith and Brittany Alexander Smith
Defendant:
Danville City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Maxey et al
as 7:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
G. T. Maxey, Timothy W. Allen, William N. Alexander, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jason Clem
Defendant:
Israel Hamilton, Bernard Morris, Lyons Sanchezconcha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childs v. Alexander et al
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Childs
Defendant:
Sgt. Alexander and PREA Response Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Thomas Alexander Davis, III
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron v. Ellis III et al
as 1:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Alexander Cameron
Respondent:
T.S. Ellis III, Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria, United States District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bell v. USA
as 3:2023cv00323
Petitioner:
Alexander Edward Bell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
