Cases 11 - 20 of 521
ANDREWS v. USA
as 1:2023cv01054
Petitioner:
ALENA DEANNE ANDREWS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Moore v. Cassidy
as 3:2023cv00665
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Moore
Respondent:
David Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRICE v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PRICE
Defendant:
D.C. ROBINSON, CYNTHIA B. KENNEY, DUSTIN YUENGLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Robinson et al
as 5:2023ct03262
Plaintiff:
James E. Price
Defendant:
D.C. Robinson, Cynthia B. Kenney, Dustin Yuengling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDREWS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00638
Petitioner:
JARVARIS ANTWAN ANDREWS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Phillips v. USA
as 1:2023cv00163
Petitioner:
Joshua Andrew Phillips
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ALLEN v. NURSE (FNU)(LNU) et al
as 1:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JACKSON ALLEN
Defendant:
NURSE (FNU)(LNU) and DISTRICT ATTORNEY (FNU)(LNU)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballentine v. Corrections Officers et al
as 5:2023ct03166
Plaintiff:
Jarell Donte Ballentine
Defendant:
Corrections Officers, Andrew Whitley, Captain Tracy Hamby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCREE v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
ADAM LEE MCREE and KEVIN VAUGHN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN FLINT, SARGEANT WALLACE and ANDREW C. COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
