Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Adams v. Thompson et al
as 0:2022cv03047
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lee Adams
Defendant:
Mark Thompson, Kathleen A. Loomis, County of Hennepin, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bush v. Minnesota Department of Corrections
as 0:2022cv02215
Petitioner:
Adam Bush
Respondent:
Minnesota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Lindlbauer et al
as 0:2022cv02011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Brooks
Defendant:
David A. Lindlbauer, Jana Brister-Korby, Charles S. Fai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linderman v. USA
as 0:2022cv01891
Petitioner:
Daine Joseph Adam Linderman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Aery v. Beitel et al
as 0:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
James Paul Aery
Defendant:
Ernie Beitel, Collardra Allen, AJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaFon v. Fikes
as 0:2022cv00487
Petitioner:
Nicholas Adam LaFon
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kurtenbach v. City of Shakopee et al
as 0:2021cv02379
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kurtenbach
Defendant:
City of Shakopee, Scott County, Joshua Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2021cv02382
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail, The, Sherburne County, Elk River City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hageman et al v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2021cv02096
Plaintiff:
Adam Hagman, Dane Vander Voort, Paul Primrose and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Shannon Reimann, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plasa v. Spray et al
as 0:2021cv00933
Respondent:
United States Marshal's Service and Adam Spray
Petitioner:
Michael R. Plasa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
