Cases 11 - 20 of 235
Vonehl v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Vonehl
Defendant:
S. Lovett, Office of Inspector General and Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Steele v. FCI Hazelton Medical Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lacosta Steele
Defendant:
FCI Hazelton Medical Staff, Mr Boach, Mrs Resh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Via v. Reedy
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Adam Via
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Reedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bock v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00322
Petitioner:
Adam N. Bock
Respondent:
Melissa J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams v. USA
as 1:2022cv00103
Petitioner:
Tyron Terreono Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thompson v. Underwood et al
as 5:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Aaron Granville Thompson
Defendant:
Jennifer Underwood, Dr. Emmanuel Adams and Warden, FCI Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scott v. Winters et al
as 2:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott, Sr. and Michael A Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Zachary Winters, Adam Mason and The City of Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Underwood et al
as 3:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Aaron Granvill Thompson
Defendant:
Jennifer Underwood, Dr. Emmanuel Adams and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. Hudgins et al
as 5:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
Saundra L. White
Respondent:
Warden Hudgins, SFF Warden P. Adams, SFF K-Unit Manager Lori Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams v. USA
as 1:2022cv00078
Petitioner:
Tyron Terreono Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
