Cases 11 - 20 of 509
Sexton v. Griffith et al
as 2:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
Dustin Andrew Sexton
Defendant:
Sergeant John Griffith and Jail Administrator Jacob Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Patterson et al
as 4:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Mariquse McCan, Cieria Wasghington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Freem et al
as 2:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Andrew Palmer
Defendant:
Freem, Neal, Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youngberg v. Long et al
as 4:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Charles Youngberg
Defendant:
Brandon Long, Kyle Dottson, Taylor Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogburn v. Arkansas Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Kevin Andrew Cogburn
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections and Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennings v. Elrod et al
as 6:2023cv06084
Plaintiff:
Wendell Brock Bennings
Defendant:
Chief Steven Elrod, Sheriff Mike McCormick, Captain Joel Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Branham et al
as 4:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Avery, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Phillips et al
as 6:2023cv06060
Plaintiff:
Bryan Andrew Lewis
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Fred Phillips and Sheriff Scott Finkbinor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Clark et al
as 4:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Morgan
Defendant:
Andrew Clark, Rosieanna Lee and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Besuglow v. Devore et al
as 4:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Andrew Besuglow
Defendant:
Devore and Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
