Cases 11 - 20 of 497
Carmichael v. Morgan et al
as 2:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
Roderick Carmichael
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan and B Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Walker County Jail et al
as 6:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Christopher B Cummings
Defendant:
Walker County Jail, Sheriff Smith, Administrator White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Storey v. Steele (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Melvin Storey
Defendant:
Deon B. Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Hollis Chadwick Smith
Defendant:
Nick Smith, Tidwell, QCHC Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rogers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Roger Jay Jones, II
Defendant:
Courtney B. Rogers and Officer Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 4:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
O. Parker, D. Dent, C. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
O. Parker, D. Dent, C. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama et al
as 4:2022cv01191
Petitioner:
Randal B McCoy
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Calhoun County Jail Medical Admin (INMATE 1)
as 1:2022cv01162
Plaintiff:
Randal B McCoy
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail Medical Admin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
