Cases 11 - 20 of 220
Searles Jr v. Barrett et al
as 1:2023cv03024
Plaintiff:
Leon D Searles Jr
Defendant:
Nickolas B Barrett, Washington State Bar Association, Joseph Brusic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 4:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Andrewjeski
as 3:2023cv05095
Petitioner:
Roy B Boswell
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Bellingham Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv01863
Plaintiff:
Vincent Russell
Defendant:
Bellingham Police Department, C Johnson, B Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv06015
Plaintiff:
James Edward Clayton and Okie Redpaw
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Casey Kaech, Lara Stick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv01575
Petitioner:
Anthony B Thompson
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphreys v. Wilson et al
as 3:2022cv05628
Plaintiff:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Defendant:
Heather Wilson, Brittany Botsel, Gina Penrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nave v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2022cv00186
Petitioner:
Nathan B Nave
Respondent:
Andrew Jeski and Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patu v. Smokoska et al
as 2:2022cv00895
Plaintiff:
Solomona Ricky Patu
Defendant:
B Smokoska, Harbert and Melinda Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
