Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Crowder v. Bayless
as 3:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Danny B. Crowder, Jr.
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bowers v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jessica B. Bowers
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Department of Homeland Security, Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Young v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Young
Defendant:
Warden D. L. Young, Warden Heckard, B. L. Fain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stewart v. Mucciola et al
as 5:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Stewart
Defendant:
Gabrielle E. Mucciola, Judge Tucker, Morgantown WV Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook, Jr. v. Lanham et al
as 5:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cook, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Kelly Lanham and Aaron Linn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tartt v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Jason B. Tartt, Donnie Hairston and Ventriss Hairston
Defendant:
Dalton T. Martin, James Muncy, Jordan A. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jones
Defendant:
Lt. Jenkins, C. Ord, H. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lee-Thomas v. Antonelli
as 3:2021cv00187
Petitioner:
Gary Justin Lee-Thomas
Respondent:
B. M. Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reid v. Wilson et al
as 2:2021cv00647
Plaintiff:
Brian Reid
Defendant:
West Virginia State Police, Corporal A. B. Wilson, Trooper Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beahm v. Young et al
as 5:2021cv00547
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Beahm
Defendant:
D. L. Young, P. Boulet, B. Fain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
