Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Disla-Ripol v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50357
Petitioner:
Humberto Disla-Ripol
Respondent:
B. Lammer and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kareem Milhouse v. B. Lammer
as 5:2023cv01205
Petitioner:
Kareem Milhouse
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Curtis Tyrell Bunn v. B. Lammer
as 5:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
Curtis Tyrell Bunn
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Curtis Tyrell Bunn v. B. Lammer et al
as 5:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Curtis Tyrell Bunn
Defendant:
Warden B. Lammer, Ms. Langela, A. Valli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis D. Arnold et al v. M. Rios et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Arnold, K. Oshiro, Sen. Ofcr. Danny Long and Spouse and others
Defendant:
Ms. M. Rios, B. Lammer, Lt. M. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman Wyatt v. Warden B. Lammer
as 2:2022cv05170
Petitioner:
Thurman Wyatt
Respondent:
Warden B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Travis D. Arnold v. B. Lammer et al
as 2:2022cv03894
Petitioner:
Travis D. Arnold
Respondent:
Complex Warden B. Lammer and A. W. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
AYALA v. LAMMER
as 2:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
RAFAEL AYALA
Respondent:
B. LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BERNADEL v. LAMMER
as 2:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
MARIO-GERARD BERNADEL
Respondent:
B. LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MILLER v. LAMMER
as 2:2022cv00033
Petitioner:
CALVIN A. MILLER
Respondent:
B. LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
