Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Epting v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2016cv03172
Plaintiff:
Betty Frances Taylor Epting
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Minnie Macon and Larry Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ware v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00905
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ware
Defendant:
Betty Smith, Mr Samual, Mr Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Stirling et al
as 8:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Syncere Rivera
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Joseph McFadden, Mendie Disbrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law et al v. Fairfax, The Town of et al
as 1:2015cv03309
Plaintiff:
Charles Law, Sr and Betty J Law
Defendant:
Fairfax, The Town of , John Doe and J Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss et al
as 3:2015cv03186
Plaintiff:
Marie Therese H Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Sarah Heather Savitz Weiss, John Meadors, Barney Giese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant et al v. Sumter, City of et al
as 3:2013cv03491
Plaintiff:
Betty Grant , Brittany Grant , Richard Grant and others
Defendant:
Sumter, City of, CJ Lyons, Detective Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Ladson et al
as 4:2013cv02337
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Phillips
Defendant:
Betty Ladson , Timothy Grooms , Dennis Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Byars et al
as 8:2013cv01234
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Syncere Rivera
Defendant:
William Byars, Jr, Betty Smith, Larry Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Esskew v. Arwood et al
as 6:2012cv01354
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kelly Esskew
Defendant:
Freddie Arwood, Bruce Bryant, Richard Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westbrook v. Arwood et al
as 9:2011cv02872
Plaintiff:
Stephen Westbrook
Defendant:
James Arwood, Patricia Aube, Bruce Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
