Cases 11 - 20 of 29
BOWLING v. CANTRELL et al
as 1:2019cv01196
Defendant:
ERIC CANTRELL, STEVE BILLS, FAYETTE COUNTY WORK RELEASE and others
Plaintiff:
DAMON BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLING v. LOGAN et al
as 1:2018cv02596
Defendant:
Lee, T. Randall, L. Blair and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRORY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2017cv03625
Defendant:
JIM BASINGER, SHANNON BOWLING, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY MCCRORY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWLING v. ZATECKY
as 1:2017cv02236
Petitioner:
TRISTAN BOWLING
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. JORDAN et al
as 1:2017cv00493
Plaintiff:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Defendant:
CORIZON, JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Allen County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
David Taylor
Defendant:
Allen County Jail, Commander Cook, Sgt Faither and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLING v. SEVIER
as 1:2016cv02059
Petitioner:
STEVEN BOWLING
Respondent:
M. SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv01913
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv01147
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv00855
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
