Cases 11 - 20 of 48
TRIPATI v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00427
Defendant:
KRISTIN WHITNEY BASHA, LUCY M. RAUD, NICHOLAS D. ALEDO and others
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Boyer v. McGinley et al
as 1:2019cv01835
Petitioner:
Donald Edward Boyer, Jr.
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley, PA State Attorney General and Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. LOYSVILLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER et al
as 2:2019cv03770
Defendant:
ZACHARY BRIGGS, BRYCE GEARHART, LOYSVILLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE SMITH, V.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Meehan-Bennet et al
as 3:2019cv00388
Defendant:
Warden Gene Beasley, SIA S. Prutzman, Associate Warden S. Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Thor Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCFADDEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01320
Plaintiff:
TALLI MCFADDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MANUEL SANTIAGO, FRANK JASTRZEMBSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyer v. Garmen et al
as 3:2017cv00703
Plaintiff:
Bruce Boyer
Defendant:
Mark Garmen and Timothy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. GLASS et al
as 3:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GLASS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOYER and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. FRACKVILLE PRISON et al
as 3:2016cv02104
Plaintiff:
WALTER OLA SCOTT
Defendant:
FRACKVILLE PRISON, KRAYNAKS, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE L. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. GLASS et al
as 3:2016cv00218
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GLASS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOYER and JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. FRACKVILLE PRISON et al
as 2:2016cv04705
Plaintiff:
WALTER OLA SCOTT
Defendant:
FRACKVILLE PRISON, KRAYNAKS, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE L. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
