Cases 11 - 20 of 234
McCLAIN v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
MARTINA WHITE, RALPH MCCLAIN, SHAWN WHITE and others
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANGELUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, FAYETTE COUNTY, FAYETTE COUNTY EXECUTIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MACON v. GRESSEL
as 1:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
DANIEL T. MACON
Defendant:
MRS. GRESSEL, DR. CAMACHO, Mrs. MASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DUGAN v. PA D.O.C. et al
as 2:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE DUGAN
Defendant:
PA D.O.C., GEORGE LITTLE, SCI GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2023cv03099
Plaintiff:
NIGEL DEDIEECE CARTER
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and CHESTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Bryant Arroyo
Defendant:
Thomas S. McGinley, Deputy J. Gibson, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANDOLPH v. MOORE et al
as 2:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RANDOLPH
Defendant:
JUSTIN MOORE, LARRY BOGGS, ERIC HAAG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DUGAN v. CARTER et al
as 2:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE DUGAN
Defendant:
JAY CARTER, S.M. GATES, R. CHRISTOPHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: SEAN CARTER
as 2:2023cv01327
In Re:
SEAN CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: SEAN CARTER
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
SEAN CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
