Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
CREDICO v. GUTHRIE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv04476
Plaintiff: JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant: GUTHRIE, ENGLISH and CEO OF MATHEW BENDER AND COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. PRESIDENT AND CEO OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07935
Plaintiff: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant: PRESIDENT AND CEO OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., FELIPE ARIAS, J. SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. President and CEO of Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01939
Plaintiff: Alton D. Brown
Defendant: President and CEO of Prison Health Services, Inc., Felipe Arias, J. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. CEO SIEMENS ( NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE) et al
as 2:2011cv06025
Plaintiff: JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant: CEO SIEMENS ( NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE), CEO IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heim v. Dauphin County Prison et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01491
Plaintiff: Joseph Heim
Defendant: Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2010cv03492
Plaintiff: SHAFF EUGENE RANDOLPH
Defendant: SCOTT DAVIS, CEO-UPS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOW v. COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv00007
Plaintiff: THOMAS P. DOW
Defendant: COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and CEO AND/OR PRESIDENT OF SEPTA TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRITTONDEN v. GROVE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00246
Plaintiff: GREG CRITTONDEN
Defendant: WILLIAM GROVE, CEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?