Cases 11 - 20 of 307
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sredl v. Monticello City of et al
as 3:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
Jeff A Sredl and Jeff Allen Sredl
Defendant:
Monticello City of and White County Building Inspector
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sredl v. Monticello City of et al
as 4:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jeff A Sredl and Jeff Allen Sredl
Defendant:
Monticello City of and White County Building Inspector
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. IMPD et al
as 1:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
EDWIN N. HOLMES
Defendant:
IMPD, MARION COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
EDWIN N. HOLMES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TROTTER v. LOGAN et al
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY TROTTER
Defendant:
BRANDON LOGAN and CITY OF LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARREN v. GOODNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Defendant:
GREG GOODNIGHT, TYLER MOORE, CITY OF KOKOMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
