Cases 11 - 20 of 423
James v. Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
as 7:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Randall James, Jr.
Defendant:
Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pressey v. Newport News City Jail
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Donald Pressey
Defendant:
Newport News City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. City of Buena Vista et al
as 7:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Tracey Darnell Taylor
Defendant:
City of Buena Vista, Buena Vista Police Department, Joshua Elrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vyas v. Hutchenson et al
as 7:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Tarun Kumar Vyas
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Hutchenson, Captain Jimmy Wimer, Lieutenant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Danville City Jail et al
as 7:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Danville City Jail, Capt. Patty, Major Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Danville City Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Danville City Jail, Capt. Patty, Major Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Danville City Jail
as 7:2023cv00654
Petitioner:
Brittany Alexander Smith
Respondent:
Danville City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Baron et al
as 2:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
John T. Hill
Defendant:
Joe Baron, Norfolk City Sheriff Office and Norfolk City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Danville City Jail
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Brittnany Alexander Smith and Brittany Alexander Smith
Defendant:
Danville City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
