Cases 11 - 20 of 25
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00337
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
GILMORE, MORRIS and CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. WISSNER et al
as 3:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
LONNIE JENKINS
Defendant:
BRIAN JAMES WISSNER, JAMES A. ZIGARELLA and CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLAIR v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2014cv01207
Plaintiff:
MONTE D. BLAIR
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, REGINA MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY- CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2014cv00857
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY- CITY OF PITTSBURGH, MS. KATE BARKMAN, HON. KATHLEEN A. DURKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. REGAN et al
as 2:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant:
DANIEL D. REGAN, NATHAN HARPER, REGINA MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSBY v. ZUCCHER et al
as 2:2012cv00543
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JAMES MOSBY, JR.
Defendant:
ZUCCHER and CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEIL v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv00348
Plaintiff:
RACHEL NEIL
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JOHN DOE, RAMON C. RUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMP v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE et al
as 2:2011cv01328
Plaintiff:
ALONZO KEMP
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE and DAVID M. SISAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. DUFFOLA et al
as 2:2011cv00634
Plaintiff:
HOWARD J. MITCHELL
Defendant:
THOMAS DUFFOLA, THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and DOE I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. SALDUTTE et al
as 2:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE OWENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL SALDUTTE, RICHARD EWING, JR., NATHAN HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
