Cases 11 - 20 of 125
COX v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
WELBY THOMAS COX, JR.
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ZACHARY A. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WHEELER v. COX et al
as 2:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
COX, PLASSE and CHARLEY FUNK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Bradley M Cox
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Jason Stewart and Joseph Gass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCIS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANCIS
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, CHARLEY FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASKO et al v. STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
DAVID PASKO, LASHAWAN TOMPKINS, GRAYLON BELL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF VIGO, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS OF VIGO COUNTY, BILL WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MERRIWEATHER v. STONER et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
JAMES O. MERRIWEATHER
Defendant:
MARK D. STONER, RUCKER, DYLIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv02068
Petitioner:
AARON COX
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
EATON v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
ARSENIO EATON
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, MELISSA and COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY A. BERRY, II
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DUSHAN ZATECKY, HUGHETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01147
Petitioner:
GINGER COX
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
