Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Judd v. The County of Buncombe County et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Judd
Defendant:
The County of Buncombe County, Jack Van Duncan, Tina Cox Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Tabor Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2022ct03449
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Griffin
Defendant:
Tabor Correctional Institution, M. Cox, Jamie Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragland v. Vance County et al
as 5:2022ct03409
Plaintiff:
Kim Ragland and Kenneth Watkins
Defendant:
Vance County, City of Henderson, W.E. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau et al
as 5:2022ct03311
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Centralize Infraction Bureau, North Carolina Superior Court, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. USA
as 1:2022cv00243
Petitioner:
TEVIN LASHAUN COX
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Yates v. West et al
as 5:2021ct03379
Plaintiff:
William Yates
Defendant:
District Attorney Billy West, Rita Cox and Brian Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dye et al
as 5:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Eric Dye, FNU LNU, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. SEABOLT et al
as 1:2021cv00906
Plaintiff:
KA'LAH (KALAH) MARTIN
Defendant:
GREGORY SEABOLT, STEVEN W MYERS, TRAVIS SHORT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03348
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Cox
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Cox et al
as 5:2021ct03302
Plaintiff:
Alex Ohara King
Defendant:
Detective Jared Cox, Sunset Beach Police Department, Daniel Chris Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
