Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Short v. Anderson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2007cv02989
Petitioner:
Eddie Short
Respondent:
Carl S. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartley v. Gonzales et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2007cv01518
Plaintiff:
Damon Armond Hartley
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Carl R. Anderson, Victor Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Anderson
as 1:2007cv00693
Petitioner:
Timothy Newell
Respondent:
Carl S Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. Anderson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-4558
Petitioner - Appellant:
NOLEN BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
CARL S. ANDERSON, Warden
Brooks v. Anderson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-4286
Petitioner - Appellant:
QUAMAINE BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BOBBY, Warden and CARL S. ANDERSON, Warden
Landrum v. Mitchell
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-4194
Petitioner - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LAWRENCE LANDRUM
Respondent - Appellant:
CARL S. ANDERSON, Warden
Respondent - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
BETTY MITCHELL, Warden
Tyler v. Anderson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:1996cv01881
Petitioner:
Arthur Tyler
Respondent:
Carl S. Anderson
Interested_party:
Stuart A. Saferin and Leroy Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.