Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Tommy Hall v. Prosecuting Attorney C. Jones, et al
as 12-2775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tommy D. Hall
Defendant - Appellee:
Prosecuting Attorney Carlton Jones, Kate Carter, J. Savage, Arresting Officer and others
Tommy Hall v. Texarkana, AR Police Dept, et al
as 12-1963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tommy D. Hall
Defendant - Appellee:
Texarkana, Arkansas Police Department and Carlton Jones, Prosecuting Attorney
Tommy Hall v. Prosecuting Attorney Jones, et al
as 11-3699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tommy D. Hall
Defendant - Appellee:
Prosecuting Attorney Carlton Jones, Kate Carter, J. Savage, Arresting Officer and others
Hall v. Jones et al
as 4:2011cv04055
Plaintiff:
Tommy Hall
Defendant:
Carlton Jones, Kate Carter and J. Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Texarkana, Arkansas Police Department et al
as 4:2011cv04056
Plaintiff:
Tommy Hall
Defendant:
Texarkana, Arkansas Police Department and Carlton Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Jones et al
as 4:2011cv04057
Plaintiff:
Javar Wilson
Defendant:
Carlton Jones, Arkansas, State of and Miller County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgell v. Autrey et al
as 4:2010cv04182
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Ridgell
Defendant:
Judge Autrey, Sgt. Miller, Bret Haltom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dancer v. Haltom et al
as 4:2010cv04118
Plaintiff:
Douglas Dancer
Defendant:
Brent Haltom, Carlton Jones, David Easley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Griffin et al
as 4:2010cv04039
Plaintiff:
J.C. Otis Collins
Defendant:
Griffin, Carlton Jones, Wayne Dowel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Miller County Circuit Court Officials et al
as 4:2007cv04016
Plaintiff:
Tommy D. Hall
Defendant:
Miller County Circuit Court Officials, Kirk Johnson, Jim Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
