Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Pritchett v. Bryant et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Pritchett
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Clifford Walker, Lyn Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv01262
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Miles
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles, Kim Thomas, Robert P. Longshore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCaa v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne McCaa
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Dan Thompson, William W. Wynne, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fretwell v. Wynne et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00836
Plaintiff:
Larry Gene Fretwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Wynne, Robert P. Longshore and Clifford Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. Wynn et al
as 5:2013cv02000
Plaintiff:
Zephrus Strickland
Defendant:
Bill Wynn, Clifford Walker, Robert Longshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fretwell v. Wynne et al
as 5:2013cv01778
Plaintiff:
Larry Gene Fretwell, Jr
Defendant:
Bill Wynne, Robert P Longshore and Clifford Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demonsia Ricks v. William Wynne, Jr., et al
as 12-16360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMONSIA LAPEZ RICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM W. WYNNE, JR., ROBERT P. LONGSHORE, CLIFFORD WALKER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addie v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00297
Plaintiff:
Danny Lamar Addie
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, William W. Wynne, Jr., Robert P. Longshore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Doug Vasbinder
as 2:2007cv10133
Petitioner:
Clifford Walker
Respondent:
Doug Vasbinder
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
