Cases 11 - 20 of 118
THOMPSON v. HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
MEGAN N. THOMPSON
Defendant:
HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NICK SMITH, PAUL BICKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DARDEN v. MARTINI et al
as 1:2023cv02250
Plaintiff:
JAYDEN W. DARDEN
Defendant:
KARL MARTINI, VOLGEMAN, WIEGAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00991
Petitioner:
Carlester Iswar Cole and Carlester Cole
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUGH v. PARKE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT et al
as 2:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. BAUGH
Defendant:
PARKE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT, JUSTIN COLE, ED ROACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSE v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. ROSE
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ANDREW COLE, JOHN POER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, GOBBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLES v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
SHERROD COLES
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
COLE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00148
Petitioner:
STEPHEN COLE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
