Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Cole v. Warden of FPC-Lewisburg
as 1:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Michael Cole
Respondent:
Warden of FPC-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRIS v. COLE et al
as 5:2022cv05147
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARRIS
Defendant:
AMY COLE, MOSES MARTINEZ, ERIC S. PENNYPACKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv01662
Petitioner:
Michael Cole
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WEEKLEY v. SGT. PROVIDENT et al
as 1:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
MONROE WEEKLEY, III
Defendant:
SGT. PROVIDENT, OFFICER COLE, OFFICER DRAYER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES, II v. EVANS et al
as 2:2022cv01744
Petitioner:
ANTHONY W. JONES, II
Defendant:
MR. EVANS, MS. NELSON, ATTORNEY GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITAKER v. SCI-FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
DAMION D. WHITAKER
Defendant:
SCI-FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COLES v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv02133
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DEMANUEL COLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cole v. Finley
as 1:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
Philbert Cole
Defendant:
Scott Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ESTATE OF STERLING COLE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv03924
Defendant:
ROBERT D TAYLOR, GERALD MAY, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF STERLING COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
