Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Lewis v. Bennett et al
as 5:2008ct03140
Plaintiff:
Jamal C. Lewis
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Dennis Rowland, Tarquintus Walser and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Rowland et al
as 5:2008ct03126
Defendant:
Dennis Rowland, Tarquintus Walser and Morris Reid
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hardy v. Bennett et al
as 5:2008ct03044
Plaintiff:
Lester Hardy
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett and Dennis Rowland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. North Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 3:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
Antonio J. Williams
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction, Polk Correctional Institution, Dennis Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Rankins v. Dennis Rowland
as 08-6407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS ROWLAND, MICHAEL MUNNS, RICHARD T. JONES and others
Defendant - None:
EARNEST SUTTON, JOHN DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, JOHN DOE, Health Authority and others
Lester Hardy v. Boyd Bennett
as 08-6273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOYD BENNETT and DENNIS ROWLAND
Lowery v. Bennett et al
as 5:2008ct03023
Plaintiff:
John N. Lowery
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Dennis Rowland, Tarquintus Walser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowery v. Bennett et al
as 1:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
John N. Lowery
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Dennis Rowland, Tarquintus Walser and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norman v. Craig et al
as 5:2007ct03137
Plaintiff:
Timothy G. Norman
Defendant:
Elexia Craig, Rashad O. Royster, Correctional Officer Broummel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Burke
as 07-7401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC L. TOLBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BURKE, SERGEANT WILLIAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BRUMELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
