Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Morris, David v. Dickman, Robert
as 3:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
David H. Morris
Defendant:
Robert Dickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Morris et al
as 1:2011cv00160
Petitioner:
Arson I. Gibbs, Sr.
Respondent:
David Lee Morris and Alice M Symonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris et al v. Kesselring et al
as 1:2009cv01739
Plaintiff:
David Lee Morris, Pamela Morris and Randy Morris
Defendant:
Ronald Kesselring, Robert Kesselring, Zumbrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00971
Petitioner:
David Gene Morris
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Morris v. Charles Aycock, et al
as 09-10383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GENE MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES AYCOCK, Parole Board Member, Amarillo Board Office, CHARLES A SHIPMAN, Parole Board Commissioner, Amarillo Board and RISSIE OWENS, Presiding Officer, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Morris v. Agnew et al
as 1:2008cv00822
Plaintiff:
David Lee Morris
Defendant:
Sharon D. Agnew and LaToya S. Brady
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morris v. Phelps et al
as 1:2008cv00505
Petitioner:
David L. Morris
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morris v. Aycock et al
as 2:2008cv00147
Plaintiff:
David Gene Morris
Defendant:
Charles Aycock, Charles A Shipman and Risse Owens
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morris v. Heredia
as 1:2008cv00615
Plaintiff:
David Jay Morris
Defendant:
Mike Heredia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Geoffrey Atwell v. Thomas Lavan, et al
as 08-2228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEOFFREY WILLARD ATWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, LEE T. BERNARD, II, PATRICIA BLIZZARD and others
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, MARK S. SCHWEIKER, SARAH HART and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
