Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Jenkins v. Star et al
as 0:2021cv01615
Petitioner:
Anitra D. Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden Star and Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
King v. Kallis et al
as 0:2021cv01149
Petitioner:
Clement David King
Respondent:
Unnamed Bureau of Prisons Regional Director and Warden Kallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miles v. Director - Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2021cv00932
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, S. Warden Kallas and Director - Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Jerome Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fiorito v United States of America et al.
as 0:2020cv02679
Defendant:
BOP General Counsel Doe, Mr. Brewer, Ian Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hageman v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2020cv02257
Defendant:
CPD Quist, CPD Scott, Safety Director Karels and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hageman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v United States Department of Justice et al
as 0:2019cv02713
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Health Services Administrator, Captain Shannon Bauserman and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cota v. Jones & Magnus PLLC et al
as 0:2015cv02089
Plaintiff:
George Frank Cota
Defendant:
Jones & Magnus PLLC, Ryan B. Magnus, Mark F. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Niewind v. Smith et al
as 0:2014cv04744
Plaintiff:
Eric Allen Niewind
Defendant:
Michelle Smith, Chris Esty, Melissa Caffes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv04193
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
