Cases 11 - 20 of 148
Beadle v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2023cv02085
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jerome Beadle
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Officer FNU Hilson, Doctor C. Gatewood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Hall et al
as 3:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Respondent:
Daron Hall, Tony Wilkes, Adm. Joseph (l/n/u) and others
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sales v. Dillon et al
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Antwain Tapaige Sales
Defendant:
Lauren Dillon, Renee Blackwell, Tari Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dotson v. Hall
as 3:2022cv00943
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Respondent:
Darron Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Swain v. Parris et al
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Raymond X Bailey and Ron Swain
Defendant:
Michael W Parris, Anthony Hill, Justin Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Woods et al
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Mathis
Defendant:
Unit Manager Woods, Unit Sgt. Mann, Lt. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pike v. Helton et al
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Christa Pike
Defendant:
Lisa Helton, Lee Dotson, Gloria Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. Parker et al
as 2:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Nico Farmer
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Lee Dotson and Tranyor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Nico Farmer
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Lee Dotson and Tranyor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Robinson et al
as 3:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Williams
Defendant:
Brandon Robinson, Cpl Corbin, Mike Parris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
