Cases 11 - 20 of 78
ELLIS v. BERKS COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2021cv01874
Defendant:
ROBERT A. GRACI, BERKS COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE COUNTY OF BERKS and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ELLIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TWARDZIK v. DEVERO
as 2:2020cv04105
Plaintiff:
JASON TWARDZIK
Defendant:
OFFICER ELLIS DEVERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2021cv00288
Defendant:
Frederick Thomas, Michael D. Spriggs, Michael Green and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2020cv05269
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK GARMAN and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
FREDERICK ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freedland v. Mattingly et al
as 1:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Beth Mattingly, F.N.U. L.N.U. and Christopher Angelini
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ellis Freedland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Donnell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Renee Shrimp, 10 A/POC CO's, Jane/John Doe(s) Psychologists and others
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. DELISMA et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
ROXANNE PLAYSO, OFFICER FETTERMAN, BRIAN P. HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FORREST v. BEDELL et al
as 2:2019cv04204
Defendant:
DR. MOCLOCK, TONER, TRISHA KELLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCracken v. Fulton County et al
as 3:2019cv01063
Defendant:
Fulton County Deputy Sheriff John Doe # 1-5, Trooper James Dountas, Corporal Ellis Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick McCracken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COVINGTON v. BUCKS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv03062
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAWS, ANTHONY DISANDRO, LIEUTENANT ROBERT GORMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
