Cases 11 - 20 of 107
HONEA v. HOGAN et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. HONEA
Defendant:
ALLEGRA HOGAN, MICHAEL AMEZQUITA, MIKE WIZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Vancey et al
as 5:2023ct03346
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
D. Vancey, Jason Farmer, Ms. Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02236
Petitioner:
Kenneth Powell
Respondent:
State of North Carolina, Lorrin Freeman and Wake County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meyers v. Freeman et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Freeman, FNU Honeycutt, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Turner et al
as 5:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Quentin Freeman
Defendant:
FNU Turner, FNU Young, FNU Eckard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Duncan, FNU Freeman, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Warden of Central Prison et al
as 5:2022ct03425
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ellis
Defendant:
Warden of Central Prison, Ramel Freeman and Donnie R. Raynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00868
Petitioner:
LORI STOIN FREEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
FREEMAN v. SCOTLAND COUNTY
as 1:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. FREEMAN
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
