Cases 11 - 20 of 67
MUIR v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv04459
Defendant:
MR. J. HALL, JANE DOES, MR. S. SWARY and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL MUIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Finley
as 3:2020cv00281
Respondent:
Warden Scott Finley
Petitioner:
Justin Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KEEL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2019cv04797
Defendant:
ALY WILLIAMS, ARIANNA J. FREEMAN, DAVID W. BARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
MR. JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2019cv04333
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA., MARK CAPOZZA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
Petitioner:
CHARLES FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FREEMAN v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL (PENN) et al
as 2:2018cv02914
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL (PENN), PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATT. OFFICE, MR. DAVID RANCHER and others
Plaintiff:
BARRY FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 2:2018cv01031
Petitioner:
BARRY FREEMAN
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FREEMAN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv01506
Plaintiff:
GARRETT FREEMAN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL , ERIC BUSH , STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION PINE GROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. McGinley et al
as 3:2017cv00966
Petitioner:
Freeman William May
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEWALD et al v. HILLER et al
as 2:2017cv02016
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. DEWALD, II, KRIS PYLANT, DAMIEN CAMMILE and others
Defendant:
MARK HILLER, DAVID BYRNE and COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv02422
Plaintiff:
Rocky L. Freeman
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Probation Department, J. Lincalis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
