Cases 11 - 20 of 87
WILLIAMS v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00240
Petitioner:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GREGORY C DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TREADWELL v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY TREADWELL and DAVID JAMALSON
Defendant:
LT DAVIS, LIEUTENANT RONNIE SHOEMAKER, MCCRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00227
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MOSS
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT, Clay Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOTSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00225
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT, CLAY NIX and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert v. Deal et al
as 6:2019cv00052
Defendant:
Commissioner Gregory C. Dozier, Brian Adams, Warden James Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Jermarae Herbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHIDEN v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00197
Defendant:
JACK RANDY SAULS, CLAY NIX, RICKY MYRICK and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GHIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2019cv01254
Respondent:
GREGORY C. DOZIER and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harmon, Jr v. Williams et al
as 6:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Cindy L. Smith, Gregory C. Dozier and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Jenkins Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00164
Petitioner:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER GREGORY C DOZIER and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOGAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, EDMUND J BAZAR, JR, HUGH SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
