Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Cunningham v. Estes et al
as 5:2015cv01127
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cunningham
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes, Guy Noe, Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Edward Philpot Hickman
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Prentiss Griffith Detention Center et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Herman Richard Corley, Jr.
Defendant:
Prentiss Griffith Detention Center , Heath Taylor , William Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Hooteh et al
as 4:2012cv00799
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
J Hooteh, R Hooteh, W Howard and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. United States of America (INMATE3)
as 3:2011cv01084
Plaintiff:
James Harold Griffith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griffith v. Mitchem et al
as 4:2010cv00397
Petitioner:
Jody Edwin Griffith
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson et al v. Broyles et al
as 4:2009cv01512
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
D Broyles, D Lukima, B. Griffith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. O'Nell et al
as 2:2009cv00913
Plaintiff:
James W Griffith
Defendant:
Michael O'Nell, Bob Riley, J Randall McNeill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Wise et al
as 4:2008cv01609
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Ford, III
Defendant:
D. Wise, Deborah Gardner, B Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ford v. Peterson et al
as 4:2008cv01608
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Ford, III
Defendant:
Peterson, Edna Byers, J. Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
