Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Michael Gibbs, Jr. v. Bill Haslam, et al
as 13-5644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. GIBBS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL HASLAM, in his official capacity as governor, JIM HAMMONDS, in his official capacity as sheriff, M MONZON and others
Ory v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Shannon Ory
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, Hamilton County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Jim Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Smith v. Hamilton County, Tennessee, et al
as 13-5186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC DEWAYNE SMITH
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, DEBBIE MORRIS, With I/A, JIM HAMMOND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER OWENS and OFFICER DANIEL
Donnie Shelby, Jr. v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2013cv00016
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , CCA Properties of Tennessee, LLC , CCA of Tennessee, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie Shelby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Deleon v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Alberto E Deleon
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, Jim Hammond, Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00339
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc., Hamilton County, Tennessee , Paul Jennings and others
Plaintiff:
Countess Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbison v. Hamilton County, Tennessee
as 1:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Edward Jerome Harbison
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swafford v. Correction Corporation Of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00202
Plaintiff:
Joseph Swafford
Defendant:
Correction Corporation Of America, Inc., Hamilton County, Tennessee County Government, Warden Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
